The Freeway Transactive Xtra ceiling track hoist provides maximum lifting height and room-to-room transfer capability via a fixed overhead track, with an ultra-low profile body that maximises the available lifting range. Available in 130kg, 160kg, 200kg, and 270kg SWL variants, each in manual or powered drive (D suffix). Emergency stop, powered emergency lowering, and manual backup. Freeway spreader bar included. Installation requires structural ceiling assessment. Subject to LOLER 1998 6-monthly examination. 2-year warranty.
| Specification | Detail |
|---|---|
| 1001TX130 / 1001TX130D | 130kg SWL - Manual / Powered Drive |
| 1001TX160 / 1001TX160D | 160kg SWL - Manual / Powered Drive |
| 1001TX200 / 1001TX200D | 200kg SWL - Manual / Powered Drive |
| 1001TX270 / 1001TX270D | 270kg SWL - Manual / Powered Drive |
| Profile | Ultra-low - maximises lifting height in standard rooms |
| Transfer Capability | Straight track; room-covering; room-to-room (with appropriate track) |
| Safety Systems | Emergency stop; powered emergency lowering; manual backup |
| Standard Inclusion | Freeway spreader bar |
| Display | Built-in diagnostics |
| Warranty | 2 years |
| Compliance | LOLER 1998 (6-monthly examination); PUWER 1998; structural ceiling assessment mandatory |
The Freeway Transactive Xtra is lifting equipment for lifting persons at work, subject to LOLER 1998 requiring 6-monthly thorough examination by a competent person. Installation must be performed by a competent person following a structural ceiling assessment that confirms load-bearing capacity at all track mounting points for the specific SWL variant selected; this assessment must be documented and retained. PUWER 1998 requires documented staff competency training. A planned preventative maintenance schedule must be established at installation. CQC Regulation 12 compliance documentation must include the structural assessment, installation record, LOLER examination reports, and staff training records.
What structural ceiling assessment is required before a ceiling track hoist can be installed?
Before a ceiling track hoist is installed, the ceiling and floor structure above must be assessed by a qualified structural engineer or approved building surveyor to confirm that the ceiling can support the imposed loads at each track mounting point. The assessment must consider both the static load (the weight of the hoist unit and the maximum user weight as a point load at the track mounting positions) and the dynamic load (the additional forces generated during a lift, which includes acceleration and deceleration forces when the hoist raises or lowers the resident, and travel forces when the powered drive moves the unit along the track). The SWL of the selected hoist variant directly determines the minimum structural load capacity the ceiling must provide at each mounting point; a 270kg SWL variant imposes significantly greater structural requirements than a 130kg variant and may not be installable in buildings with light floor structures above the care room. The structural assessment must be performed for each specific room or route where the track will be installed, as structural capacity varies across different areas of a building. The assessment report must be retained as part of the installation documentation and reviewed before any subsequent modifications to the track system.
When should a powered drive variant be selected over a manual drive variant?
A powered drive ceiling track hoist (the D suffix variants) is indicated when the carer's effort to push the hoist unit along the track is a significant part of the total manual handling load for the transfer. In a standard straight-line track over a short distance (for example, from a bedside position to directly above a commode two metres away), a manual drive unit can be pushed by the carer with modest effort, and the manual variant is appropriate and lower-cost. Powered drive becomes indicated when: the track layout is extensive and the travel distance is long enough to cause significant carer fatigue over a working day of multiple transfers; the track has curves, junctions, or direction changes that require the carer to steer the hoist unit overhead while simultaneously managing the suspended resident; the room-to-room route crosses a doorway or corridor where propelling the hoist unit requires the carer to change grip or redirect effort; or when the care setting's MHOR 1992 risk assessment identifies the track travel effort as a significant musculoskeletal risk for carers. The powered drive variants also reduce the risk of the hoist unit building momentum during manual push that could be difficult to arrest on a long track run, which is a secondary safety consideration.